Legal Opinion

State Highway Department v. Hilliard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1966No. 42299PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The original order wherein the rule nisi was issued for the appellees to show cause why the appellant’s motion for new trial should not be granted was, in the case sub judice, sufficient to act as an order of continuance until the date when the final hearing on such motion was held.

Where a judge emeritus of the superior .court presides over the trial of a case he should, under the Act of 1962 (Ga. L. 1962, pp. 547, 549; Code Ann. § 24-2623a), determine any motion for new trial filed in such case, but where he is unable to perform such act “because of death or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Georgia Power Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foskey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Slay v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. DeKalb County v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Department of Transportation v. A. R. C. Security, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Dept. of Transp. v. ARC SECURITYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API