Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Burns

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court.— Hon. A. B. Thornell, Judge. The opinion states tbe case.—

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

It is tbe claim of tbe plaintiff that in tbe year 1891 be and tbe defendant entered into a joint enterprise for the location of mining claims in the State of Colorado, and agreed between themselves that tbe claims which they or either of them should thereafter locate, whether in their individual or joint names, should be owned by them in equal shares; that while acting under said agreement they did locate several valuable claims, among them three known as “Devil’s Own,” “Tidal Wave,” and “Bobtail Number Two,” which were entered in the individual name of the defendant, but were in fact owned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doyle v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Stafford v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Walker v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  4. Cottle v. CottleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1829

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burke v. ReiterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Jolly v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Whitman v. Chicago, Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. State v. ProostSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. State v. RodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API