Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Hale
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 99 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM LAUREL CIRCUIT COURT. (Brief not in the record.) 1. Thd train men seeing the helpless condition of the appellee ana how she was encumbered, it was their duty not only to have assisted her on the train but to have awaited the starting of the train until she was seated. Shearman & Redfield on Negligence, sec. 508.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE DuRELLB
delivbbed Tnr; opinion oe the coubt.
The appellee recovered judgment for $1,500 against' the appellant for injuries alleged to have been caused by the violent forward movement of appellant’s train at Lily — at which place appellee boarded the train of appellant — which ■ threw her against the arm of a car-seat before she could get seated. She alleged that she sustained injuries in the back, hip and knee which' confined her to her bed for some three .months, and! which were painful and permanent in their nature, since which time she has been unable to perform much labor.
The…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Lexington Ry. Co. v. BrittonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Ottinger v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. BordersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Evansville City Coach Lines, Inc. v. RogerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Louisville Railway Co. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.