Legal Opinion

State v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.

Although no motion to arrest judgment was lodged below, and therefore no exception addressed to such motion appears in the record, the defendant by virtue of the exception to the general rule laid down in Rule 21, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 213 N. C., 821, lodges motion in this Court in arrest for the insufficiency of the indictment. "We are constrained to hold that the motion is well founded and should be allowed.

The pertinent portion of the statute under which the defendant was tried, C. S., 4437 (b), reads: “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to operate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . BradleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. . JulianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. AppleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  5. In Re Estate of WeisenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API