Heath v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that the will of William Hudson was a devise of the property in question to the legal heirs of Asa S. Hudson, vesting in them at such time as they would be able to qualify, by the death of Asa S. Hudson, as legal heirs; that not only the will so provided, but the intention of the testator to so provide appears from the will, and the circumstances under which the will was executed and testator died make such intention the more reasonable and apparent.
It is the contention of the defendant in error that the testator did not succeed in expressing his…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Fifth Third Union Trust Co. v. AthenaeumHamilton County Probate Court · 1959
- Large v. National City Bank of ClevelandCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1960
- Linton v. Foursquare Gospel ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
- Billman v. BillmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
- Billman v. BillmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.