Legal Opinion

Large v. National City Bank of Cleveland

Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Decided November 14, 1960No. 581935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.

The question herein presented requires the application of the statute against perpetuities contained in Section 2131.08, Revised Code, as follows:

“No interest in real or personal property shall be good unless it must vest, if at all, not later than twenty-one years after a life or lives in being at the creation of the interest. All estates given in tail, by deed or will in lands or tenements lying within this state, .shall be and remain an absolute estate in fee simple to the issue of the first donee in tail. It is the intention by the adoption of this section to make effective in Ohio what…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Findley v. City of ConneautOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Sommers v. DoersamOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Schreiner v. Cincinnati AltenheimOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Steinbrenner v. DreherOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Dahlgren v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vicars v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Abram v. WilsonCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API