Legal Opinion

Hartsock v. Forsgren, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 1963No. 5-2918PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is an action brought by the appellant, individually and as the next friend of her minor son, Billy Avery Faulkner, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the child. The circuit court sustained a demurrer to the complaint and dismissed the suit. The only question is whether the plaintiff’s pleading states a cause of action for negligence.

The complaint avers that the defendant, in the course of its business, maintained a large tank for the storage of tar. Despite repeated protests (presumably by the plaintiff or other neighbors), the defendant allowed the tar to spill over,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Pittsburg Reduction Co. v. HortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Collier v. Citizens Coach Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  4. Ben M. Hogan & Co. v. KrugSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Seubold v. Fort Smith Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ashley County, Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Larson MacHine, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Ethyl Corp. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Rhoads v. Service MacHine CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1971
  5. Bull v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API