Legal Opinion

Emerson Sutton v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development Kenneth D. Lange Charles H. Hopkins

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1989No. 88-2257PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Emerson Sutton appeals the District Court’s 1 decision that he is not entitled to relief on his claim that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) violated his due process rights and acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it did not recertify him as a panel fee appraiser for HUD insured mortgages. We affirm.

I

HUD maintains a list of private fee appraisers, who are appointed for one-year terms to perform appraisals of property purchased with HUD-insured mortgages. When a lender seeks HUD insurance on a proposed mortgage loan, HUD requires that the subject…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Carmen Gonzalez v. Orville L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bank of Jackson County v. L. James Cherry Raymond G. NaeyaertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Bank of Jackson County v. L. James Cherry Raymond G. NaeyaertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Labalokie v. Capital Area Intermediate UnitDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Holmes v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  5. Leer Elec., Inc. v. PENNSYLVANIA, DEPT. OF LABORDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API