George v. George

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion by valuing the marital farm as of the date of commencement of the divorce action rather than the date of commencement of the trial (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [4] [b]; Dempster v Dempster, 204 AD2d 1070; Market v Markel, 197 AD2d 934).

We reject the contentions of defendant that the court erred in declining to characterize certain assets as separate property and in failing to consider defendant’s proof concerning $52,035 in…