Legal Opinion

Detroit Edison Co. v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1994No. Docket 155688PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question whether a utility must be reimbursed for the cost of relocating its equipment from within certain public rights of way that were vacated in conjunction with an economic development project.

Plaintiff, the Detroit Edison Company, appeals as of right from an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant, City of Detroit. Because we conclude that plaintiff was required to bear the cost of the relocation, we affirm.

We take our statement of pertinent facts from the parties’ stipulations of fact.

By virtue of a franchise granted to its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Detroit v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Tomazewski v. Palmer Bee Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Jamestown v. Leevers Supermarkets, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API