Conley v. Anglin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*599ORDER
Anthony Conley is incarcerated at the Danville Correctional Center in Illinois. In this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, he claims that Danville administrators and medical staff were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on the ground that Mr. Conley’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies is undisputed. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). That ruling is problematic, but any error is harmless because Mr. Conley’s amended complaint fails to state a plausible claim of deliberate indifference.
Named as defendants are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Burks v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Donald F. Greeno v. George DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Bobby Ford v. Donald JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Williams v. BaldwinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Abernathy v. MyersDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
- Anderson v. Wexford Health Sources Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020
- Antwon Manning v. Ryan Kilduff, Darren Galloway, and Karl BradfordDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2026
- Ausmus v. Wexford Health Services Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.