In re Shotwell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the creditors of Shotwell, Clerihew $; Lothman from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hooker, J., made July 7, 1891, approving and allowing the final report and account of Albert H. Lindeke, their assignee. Theodore Shotwell, Alexander M. Clerihew, and William Lothman were partners in trade on June 20, 1888, at Minneapolis, Minnesota, as wholesale merchants in dry goods, notions, and similar merchandise.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the creditors of Shotwell, Clerihew $; Lothman from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hooker, J., made July 7, 1891, approving and allowing the final report and account of Albert H. Lindeke, their assignee. Theodore Shotwell, Alexander M. Clerihew, and William Lothman were partners in trade on June 20, 1888, at Minneapolis, Minnesota, as wholesale merchants in dry goods, notions, and similar merchandise. They occupied a building on the southeast corner of First Avenue, south, and Second Street, which they rented from George A. Brackett, the owner. On that day they…
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This appeal is from an order of the district court auditing and allowing the final account of respondent, Lindeke, as the assignee of the firm of Shotwell, Clerihew & Lothman, who assigned for the benefit of creditors on June 20, 1888. This firm was a large wholesale concern, dealing generally in dry goods and notions at Minneapolis. The assignee — selected because of his peculiar qualifications and fitness for so important a trust — was a member of the firm of Lindekes, Warner & Schurmeier, a very prominent house, engaged in the same line of business in St. Paul. The stock and fixtures of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abbot v. American Hard Rubber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1861
- King v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Munn v. BurgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Bush v. ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Foxworth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- St. Paul Trust Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Davis v. Swedish-American National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Malcolmson v. Goodhue County National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- In re SheaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Hill Ex Rel. Northern Trust Co. v. HannaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.