Alexander v. Ling
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Action by A. M. Alexander against Moy Ling to recover on a promissory note. From an order vacating a judgment in his favor, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
*223Opinion by
Mr. Justice Wolverton.
The facts upon which the sole question in this case hinges are, in brief, as follows: On April 29, 1895, judgment was entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of defendant and against plaintiff for costs and disbursements, taxed at $75.50, and plaintiff was allowed thirty days to prepare a bill of exceptions. By subsequent orders of the court the time was further extended to June 24, 1895. On the last named date plaintiff delivered to Judge Hurley, who presided at the trial, his bill of exceptions, but failed to serve a copy upon the opposing counsel, as…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Rosumny v. MarksOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Western Land & Irrigation Co. v. HumfeldOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Zelig v. Blue Point Oyster, Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Bogh v. BoghOregon Supreme Court · 1949