Cornell v. Detroit Electric Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The defendant owns and operates an electric railway upon Dix avenue, in the city of Detroit, under authority granted hy the city. At the time of the accident complained of, the street was not paved; the track was laid in the center, and was several inches higher than the roadway upon either side, thereby rendering it somewhat difficult for persons to drive from one side to the other, except at the street crossings. The situation of Dix avenue, and of the streets crossing it near where the accident occurred, is shown by the diagram on following page.
The land in the vicinity was open common,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dreier v. McDermottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Muncie Street Railway Co. v. MaynardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Moore v. Kansas City & Independence Rapid Transit Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Terre Haute Electric Railway Co. v. YantIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Campbell v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.