Legal Opinion

Terre Haute Electric Railway Co. v. Yant

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1898No. 2,570PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Yigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

Appellee, who was plaintiff below, sued the Terre Haute Electric Railway Company to recover damages for a personal injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the appellant company. The complaint was in two paragraphs; the first charging negligence, the second wilful injury. The second paragraph was withdrawn. A demurrer for want of facts to the first paragraph was overruled, the cause put at issue by general denial, and verdict returned in favor of appellee for $905. A motion for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was com trary to law, was not sustained by sufficient…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. JudayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Doster v. Charlotte Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Cornell v. Detroit Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Coughtry v. Willamette Street Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Hammond, Whiting & East Chicago Electric Railway Co. v. EadsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Mahoning Valley S. E. Ry. v. HoustonMahoning Circuit Court · 1907
  4. Marion City Railway Co. v. DuboisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Evansville Electric Railway v. FolzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API