Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 19, 2001No. [No. 19, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bruñe, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant, Hill, when arraigned in the trial court, was not represented by counsel. He pleaded guilty to a narcotics-law violation, admitted a prior conviction of a similar offense, and was sentenced as a second offender to the maximum authorized prison term, which is ten years. This appeal (in which he is represented by court-appointed counsel) is from the judgment and sentence.

The indictment was in four counts. The first two counts, charged, respectively, possession and control of a narcotic drug in the City of Baltimore on November 8th,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Bute v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. I. W. Berman Properties v. Porter Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. State v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API