Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Brinkman v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1999No. 1997-2142PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 171.] THE STATE EX REL. BRINKMAN, APPELLANT, V. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Brinkman v. Indus. Comm.,

1999-Ohio-320.] Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission abuses its discretion in denying wage-loss compensation, when. (No. 97-2142–Submitted September 21, 1999–Decided November 17, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD10-1321. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant-claimant, William A. Brinkman, a Columbus policeman, sustained multiple…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Brinkman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Stahl v. Southeastern X-RayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Timken Co. v. KovachOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Yates v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Ameen v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm., 08ap-498 (3-10-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Republic Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API