Legal Opinion

Duke Energy Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 17, 2016No. Appellate Case 2014-002736; 27606PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pleicones

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the administrative law judge’s finding that the principal recovered from the sale of short-term securities was not includible in the sales factor of the multi-factor apportionment formula, and, therefore, Duke Energy was not entitled to a tax refund. See Duke Energy Corp. v. S.C. Dep’t of Revenue, 410 S.C. 415, 764 S.E.2d 712 (Ct.App.2014). We affirm as modified.

FACTS

The controversy in this case arises from the South Carolina Department of Revenue’s (“SCDOR”) computation of Duke Energy’s taxable income.

Duke Energy…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. ProvenzanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. CFRE, LLC v. Greenville County AssessorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Kennedy v. South Carolina Retirement SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Directv, Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Rent-A-Center E., Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  3. Montgomery v. Spartanburg County AssessorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Charleston Cnty. Assessor v. Univ. Ventures, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  5. Comm'rs of Pub. Works of Laurens v. City of Fountain InnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API