Legal Opinion

Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 29, 2004No. 2004-C-0179PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

885 So.2d 562 (2004)

Lester SMITH

v.

QUARLES DRILLING COMPANY.

No. 2004-C-0179.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2004.

Degan, Blanchard & Nash, Sidney W. Degan, III, Foster P. Nash, III, Travis L. Bourgeois, New Orleans, for Applicant.

Miller & Miller, Michael B. Miller, Crowley, for Respondent.

WEIMER, Justice.

This matter is before us for consideration of whether judicial interest[1] automatically attaches to attorney fees awarded in a workers' compensation judgment. For reasons that follow, we reverse the court of appeal opinion, reinstate the judgment rendered by the workers' compensation…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son LoggersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  4. Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  5. JE Merit Constructors, Inc. v. HickmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Trahan v. COCO COLA BOTTLING CO. UNITEDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Jeansonne v. SCHMOLKELouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Burns v. Interstate Brands Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Baker v. Harrah'sLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Bell v. Mid City Printers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API