Wright v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
Plaintiff sought a judgment declaring that Lane County was required to widen Hale Road, on which the plaintiff lives, to conform to the specifications set out in the Lane County Manual. Both parties moved for summary judgment and the court granted the defendant’s motion. Plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff’s first assignment of error is that the trial court should have determined that the Lane Manual, section 15.205 et seq., required Lane County to reconstruct Hale Road in conformance with the manual’s specifications. Plaintiff’s claim is frivolous for at least three reasons. First, the Lane Manual…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hyland v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Bruckman v. Breitenbush Hot Springs, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Morris v. Oregon State Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979