Legal Opinion
Preddice v. Callanan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 1987PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
In this article 78 proceeding, the Appellate Division correctly determined that petitioner was not entitled to reinstatement to his position as a provisional employee with the State Division of Probation and to back pay as a result of a jury determination that he was discharged in bad faith.
Appointments made pursuant to Civil Service Law § 65 are provisional in nature; provisional employees have no expectation of tenure and rights attendant thereto except under the limited circumstances specified…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haynes v. County of ChautauquaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Becker v. New York State Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of Benon v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Brathwaite v. Manhattan Children's Psychiatric CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Ranus v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Moscowitz v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- City of Long Beach v. Civil Service Employees Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Brown v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Mateo v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- O'Connor v. FrawleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.