Legal Opinion

Padberg v. Roos

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 11, 1966No. 51138PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment which held that two ordinances proposing charter amendments to the Charter of St. Louis County (herein referred to as the Charter) did not receive sufficient votes for passage and submission to a vote of the people.

Since March 1950, St. Louis County has been a charter county. Its Charter was adopted pursuant to the Constitution of Missouri, 1945, Article VI, Sections 18(a)-*163(l), V.A.M.S. Amendment is covered in Article VIII of the Charter. Section 82 thereof provides three methods of amendment. One of these, Section 82(2), is “By…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. City of North Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Commonwealth v. GriestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. State Ex Rel. Westhues v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Hollingsworth v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. State Ex Rel. Jones v. AtterburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. Washington Home Ownership Council, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. PribbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Osage Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. St. Louis County v. University CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. National Indemnity Company v. HarperDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API