Legal Opinion
Kauffman v. Klang
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 15, 1896Published
Appeal by defendants from judgment of the Seventh Judicial District Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The action was in replevin to recover possession of a watch and chain, the property of the- plaintiff, wrongfully detained from her by the defendants under the following circumstances:
On March 15, 1895, the defendant Klang obtained possession, of the property from the plaintiff under an agreement in writing signed by him, whereby he certified that he had rented and leased from the plaintiff the property in question, for which he agreed *380to pay $96 as follows: Twenty dollars on delivery, and. the further sum of two dollars on each arid every Thursday of every week thereafter until said sum of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gerding v. . HaskinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Smith v. . ClewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Canton Surgical & Dental Co. v. WebbNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
- La Fetra v. GloverThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894