Legal Opinion

La Fetra v. Glover

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided October 15, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Edward B. La Fetra against William A. Glover. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and defendant moves for a new trial on the minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

That “no one can transfer to another a better title than he has himself is a maxim,” says Chancellor Kent, “alike of the common and civil law, and a sale ex vi termini imports nothing more than that the bona fide purchaser succeeds to the rights of the vendor.” 2 Kent, Comm. 324. In this case the jury, by their verdict, found that Seale & Co., the owners of the diamond pin, did not sell it to the Baroness Blanc, but loaned it to her, with the liberty of purchasing same on payment of a stated price. She never availed herself of the privilege of buying,-—-never did buy,—and the pin remained the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . ClewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Canton Surgical & Dental Co. v. WebbNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  3. Heilbronn v. McAleenanNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Anderson v. McAleenanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kauffman v. KlangAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API