Legal Opinion

Baranosky v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1966No. 39399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for passing, as true, a forged instrument; the punishment, five years.

The second count of the indictment, which was submitted to the jury, charged that on or about the 2nd day of June, 1965, the appellant did pass as true a certain forged instrument, in writing, to one Bart Tabor. The instrument set out in the indictment was, according to its tenor, a check dated May 31, 1965, at Austin, Texas, drawn on the account of Hinton Motors through The Austin National Bank in the sum of $2,000, payable to D. M. Ginsburg and purportedly signed by S. E. Hinton.

It was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Olivio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Mendoza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Hickombottom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API