Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1932No. 23462PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is in brief the argument of the Industrial Commission that, since the relator married her husband after his disability, and since he performed no work after that time, and did not in fact support his wife after that time, there is no basis in law for making an award based upon total dependency.

Section 1465-82, General Code, provides that the following persons shall be presumed to be wholly dependent for support upon a deceased employe:

"(A) A wife upon a husband with whom she lives at the time of his death. * * *
"In all other cases, the question of dependency, in whole or in part, shall be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin Co. v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Welsh v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Becker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. Hocking Valley Mining Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API