Legal Opinion
Sanatass v. Consolidated Investing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 20, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered February 28, 2005, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of the Consolidated Investing Company defendants for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs causes of action based on Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6), dismissed the complaint, all counterclaims and third-party cross claims against them, and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on such causes, affirmed, without costs.
The motion court properly found that Consolidated is not liable to plaintiff pursuant to the relevant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Abbatiello v. Lancaster Studio AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Whelen v. Warwick Valley Civic & Social ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Brown v. Christopher Street Owners Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Brown v. Christopher Street Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Castillo v. 3440 LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Gonzalez v. Glenwood Mason Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bastidas v. Epic Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Morales v. D & A Food ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Morales v. D & A Food ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007