Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Morales v. D & A Food Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 2007Published

1Concurrence

Mazzarelli, J.P., and Sweeny, J.,

concur in a separate memorandum by Mazzarelli, J.P., as follows: I concur in the result reached by the majority, upon constraint of recent precedent from this Court (Sanatass v Consolidated Inv. Co., Inc., 38 AD3d 332 [2007]; Ahmed v Momart Discount Store, Ltd., 31 AD3d 307 [2006]). Those holdings allowed “owners,” who would otherwise be liable under Labor Law § 240 (1), to avoid statutory responsibility to a person injured while engaged in covered work. This avoidance of statutory liability was accomplished by reliance on provisions in leases which required…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Public Service Mutual Insurance v. GoldfarbNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Weininger v. Hagedorn & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Morris v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API