Ketchel v. Bainbridge Township
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Presiding Judge.
Appellants, Gaetana R. Ketchel et al., appeal from a judgment entry dated May 31, 1989, granting summary judgment to appellees, Bainbridge Township et al.
Certain statements contained in the parties’ briefs are unsupported by the record. We will indicate such items where appropriate in our analysis.
By way of prologue, there was a previous case, Ketchel I, litigated between these parties culminating in a decision by the. Ohio Supreme Court. Ketchel v. Bainbridge Twp. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 239, 557 N.E.2d 779. Essentially, in Ketchel I, appellants attempted to have the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Kaufman v. Village of Newburgh HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. BSW Development Group v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Jamestown Village Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Market Media Research, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State ex rel. BSW Dev. Group v. DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.