Legal Opinion

Miller v. De Maro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to *364compel the respondent to reinstate the complaint in an action entitled Miller v Radder, in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Index No. 8837/02.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought {see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. ScheinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. MendozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re the Arbitration Between Connecticut Indemnity Insurance & LaperlaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Laird v. Village of Pelham ManorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Carrano v. ModelewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API