United States v. Copening
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Based on a series of calls to 911 from an anonymous tipster, a Tulsa, Oklahoma police officer initiated an investigatory stop of a truck in which Defendant David Lerone Copening was a passenger. Thereafter, police detained Defendant via a “felony takedown.” A grand jury indicted Defendant with being a felon in posses sion of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Following the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress, Defendant entered a conditional guilty plea. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2). On appeal, Defendant challenges the underlying…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Lundstrom v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- State of Tennessee v. Guy Alvin WilliamsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.