United States v. Torres
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal arising under the Fourth Amendment, we consider whether Philadelphia police officers possessed sufficient reasonable articulable suspicion to stop a car. The traffic stop was based on information provided by a taxi driver who called 911 after he saw a man brandish a gun at a gas station. The District Court found that the 911 call did not provide police with reasonable suspicion to effectuate the traffic stop and, accordingly, suppressed the evidence gathered after the stop. Because we find that the totality of the circumstances…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Paul PavulakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. Ebon P.D. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.