Legal Opinion
In Re Pluma
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided February 11, 2003No. 19-00498PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
JOHN J. HARGROVE, Chief Judge.
At issue is the rate of interest that will provide the County of San Diego (“County”) with payments having a present value equal to the allowed amount of its claim as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii).
This Court has jurisdiction to determine this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(b)(1) and General Order No. 312-D of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (L).
FACTS
Laura Fredrika Pluma (“Debtor”) filed her chapter 13 petition…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Camino Real Landscape Maintenance Contractors, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Camino Real Landscape Maintenance Contractors, Inc., in Re Hadrian Construction, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Hadrian Construction, Inc., in Re Armour Oil Company, Debtor. United States of America v. Armour Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Villa Diablo AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1993
- In Re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tax Collector for San Diego v. Pluma (In Re Pluma)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Laura Fredrika Pluma, Debtor, Laura Fredrika Pluma v. Tax Collector for the County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Pluma v. Tax Collector for the County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005