Legal Opinion
Tax Collector for San Diego v. Pluma (In Re Pluma)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 4, 2003No. BAP No. SC-03-1098-BARYMA. Bankruptcy No. 02-06930-B13PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAUM, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Tax Collector for the County of San Diego (“the County”) filed an objection to debtor’s chapter 13 plan. The plan (as modified) provided for interest on the County’s secured claim at 4.3%. The County argued that the interest rate on its claim should be 10%. Following an evi-dentiary hearing, the bankruptcy court overruled the County’s objection, found the appropriate interest rate to be 4.26%, and ultimately confirmed the debtor’s plan. The County timely filed its notice of appeal and asks this Panel to reverse the interest rate determination of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Camino Real Landscape Maintenance Contractors, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Camino Real Landscape Maintenance Contractors, Inc., in Re Hadrian Construction, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Hadrian Construction, Inc., in Re Armour Oil Company, Debtor. United States of America v. Armour Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Welco Industries, Inc. (In Re Welco Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Patterson v. Federal Land Bank (In Re Patterson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re PlumaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reyes v. Brown (In re Reyes)District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- In Re Laura Fredrika Pluma, Debtor, Laura Fredrika Pluma v. Tax Collector for the County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Pluma v. Tax Collector for the County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005