McAdam v. Wrisley
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.
At the close of the evidence, the Washington Superior Court directed a defendants’ verdict. In form, the judgment order ran in the singular and was captioned only against the defendant James Wrisley. The mistake is obviously purely clerical and should be corrected on remand; it can be nothing else because the only claim against the defendant Mildred Wrisley was on a respondeat superior basis. Nor can there be any question but that the defendants were entitled to a directed verdict against the plaintiff Beatrice McAdam, because her only claim was for loss of her husband’s consortium, for which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garafano v. Neshobe Beach Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Wool v. LarnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
- Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Sawyer v. EwenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
- Bolduc v. CoffinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whitney v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Allen v. Uni-First CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Alpert v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1986
- Whitney v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Whitney v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980