Legal Opinion

McAdam v. Wrisley

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 2, 1975No. 50-75PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.

At the close of the evidence, the Washington Superior Court directed a defendants’ verdict. In form, the judgment order ran in the singular and was captioned only against the defendant James Wrisley. The mistake is obviously purely clerical and should be corrected on remand; it can be nothing else because the only claim against the defendant Mildred Wrisley was on a respondeat superior basis. Nor can there be any question but that the defendants were entitled to a directed verdict against the plaintiff Beatrice McAdam, because her only claim was for loss of her husband’s consortium, for which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Garafano v. Neshobe Beach Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  2. Wool v. LarnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  3. Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  4. Sawyer v. EwenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  5. Bolduc v. CoffinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whitney v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  2. Allen v. Uni-First CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Alpert v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1986
  4. Whitney v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. Whitney v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API