Legal Opinion
Hoadley v. Day
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
Decided July 1, 1904No. 25,192PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOHLSAAT, .District Judge.
One Friederick Kolze, who was the owner o.f certain lots in Cook county, Ill., sold the same to a man .named Day through the agency of one Stade, his nephew, and took back as part -of the- purchase price nine notes for $6oo each, secured by deed of trust upon said lots, in groups, viz., three groups of notes, each group including three of said notes, due respectively in one, two, and -three years from November 17, 1897, secured by a. separate deed of trust dated November 17, 1897, and acknowledged November 23, 1897, on a third of said lotes, or $1,800 in each…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Sheldon v. SillSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Mexican National Railroad v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Holmes v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bushnell v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kirven v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
- Baltimore Trust Co. v. Screven CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1916
- Rommel v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934