Legal Opinion

Fischl v. Aust

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1977No. TC 73-1975, SC 24694Published

1Opinion of the Court

566 P.2d 518 (1977)

279 Or. 181

Hal FISCHL, Lloyd R. Bergman, Hubert T.E. Baker, W.T. Boyd, Jim Garvison, Donald Cawood, Phil Gardner, Earl E. Dilts, E.W. Shields, Fred Peterson, W.L. Barnett, Theodore Pilip, al Redig, Trustees, Respondents,

v.

Fred AUST, Dba Fred Aust Painting Service, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 1.

Argued and Submitted May 11, 1977.

Decided July 12, 1977.

Lynn Moore, Moore, Wurtz & Logan, Springfield, argued the cause and submitted briefs for appellant.

Jerome B. Buckley, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Herbert B. Galton…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hanns v. HannsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fischl v. AustOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lichty v. MerzenichOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ollman v. Active Homes, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API