Legal Opinion

Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2001No. 00-4044, 01-1339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Road Sprinkler Fitters Union, Local 669 represents all sprinkler fitters and their apprentices employed by Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company. The Union went on strike against Grinnell in 1994 when their collective bargaining agreement expired, and Grinnell continued its operations with nonstriking Union employees and non-Union replacement workers. After Grinnell provided payroll information but refused to provide names and home addresses of employees in the Union’s bargaining unit, the Union filed unfair labor practice charges asserting Grinnell failed to provide relevant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chicago Tribune Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JHP & Associates, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. Jhp & Associates, Llc, Doing Business as Metta Electric v. National Labor Relations Board, Local 1, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor on Appeal. Jhp & Associates, Llc, Doing Business as Metta Electric v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API