Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. VanMeveren v. District Court in & for the County of Larimer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 10, 1980No. 80SA363PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Justice.

In this original proceeding the People seek relief in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent court to reinstate a criminal information against Ralph Loren Bollig (defendant) charging him with first-degree arson, section 18-4-102(1), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8). The respondent court dismissed the information after a preliminary hearing on the ground that the defendant’s conduct did not constitute arson as a matter of law. We issued a rule to show cause and now make that rule absolute.

On March 3, 1980, the People filed a direct information alleging:

“That on or about…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. The PEOPLE v. Ross (Pawlak)Illinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Western Food Plan, Inc. v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. O'Hara Group Denver, Ltd. v. Marcor Housing Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS, ETC. v. Berkeley VillageColorado Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. People v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. State v. MarionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Cheyenne Mountain Bank v. Whetstone Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. EspinozaColorado Court of Appeals · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API