Wilson v. Dawson
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Warren Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.
The appellants, AlexanderWilson, Joseph S. Hanna and Henry H. Hanna, partners as Wilson & Hanna, sued the appellees, Henry C. Dawson, Charles J. Dawson and others.
Henry C. Dawson was indebted to Wilson & Hanna upon several promissory notes, amounting to something more than fifteen thousand dollars, on all of which, with the exception of one for twelve hundred dollars, the said Charles J. Dawson was surety. Henry C. Dawson made a mortgage to Wilson & Hanna, on certain real estate, to secure the payment of said notes, in which his wife joined. There was a mistake in the mortgage in describing a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dawson v. Real Estate BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1843
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Sanborn State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Sindlinger v. Department of Financial InstitutionsIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
- Wagner v. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1909
- In re DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1903
- Paige v. Springfield National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.