Legal Opinion

Dawe v. City of Scottsdale

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1978No. 13676-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an action by appellants to have the recorded plat of the Palo Verde Terrace declared a legally existing subdivision, for a declaration that the City of Scottsdale’s annexation of the property covered by the plat and its ordinance adopted after the plat was recorded did not affect the validity of the subdivision plan or the owners’ right to develop the property, and to compel Scottsdale to issue certain construction permits. The Superior Court entered a judgment in favor of Scottsdale, declaring Scottsdale’s zoning applicable to the Palo Verde Terrace…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  4. In re Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. Robinson v. LintzArizona Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hickory Point Partnership v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Folsom Investments, Inc. v. City of ScottsdaleDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1985
  3. Smith County Regional Planning Commission v. Hiwassee Village Mobile Home Park, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API