Legal Opinion
Quinn v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 27, 2010No. Civil Action 09-408 (CKK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
This case arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. Plaintiffs, Andrew Quinn and Jill Colgan, are parents of D.Q., a minor child born approximately fourteen weeks premature in May of 2006. They bring the instant suit against Defendant District of Columbia (“the District”), alleging that the District violated its obligations to provide D.Q. with early intervention services under Part C of the IDEA (“Part C”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1431-45, and seeking reimbursement of $71,430.01 in costs…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. GaubatzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Moradnejad v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Morrison v. Secretary of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hooker v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.