Basore v. Johnson

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

I agree with the majority opinion on appeal No. 13756. Although I see some considerations favoring its reasoning on appeal No. 13752,1 respectfully disagree with that reasoning.

I believe that § 442.390, RSMo 1978, imparts notice to Johnson of the contents of the deed from the Edwardses to the Barnetts. The deed conveyed a “negative easement” in tract B. See Tracy v. Klausmeyer, 305 S.W.2d 84, 88 (Mo.App.1957). That deed might not be a “link” in the “chain” of documents by which Johnson acquired his interest in tract B, but it was in his “chain of title” as a document by…