Legal Opinion

Garner v. Reed

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

In this workers’ compensation case, Beverly Garner, Plaintiff-Appellant, has appealed from the trial court’s finding that George Reed, d/b/a Reed’s BBQ, Defendant-Appellee, did not employ the requisite number of persons to invoke the provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law, T.C.A. § 50-6-101 et seq. The issue presented is whether Reed’s BBQ employed five or *699more persons at any one time prior to the Plaintiff’s injury on July 27, 1990. There is apparently no dispute that the Plaintiffs injury would be compensable if the workers’ compensation scheme applies.

We hold…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Winchester v. SeayTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Black v. DanceTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Buck & Simmons Auto & Electric Supply Co. v. KestersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hill v. KingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amos v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hubble v. Dyer Nursing HomeTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kirksey v. Assurance Tire Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Suddath v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Norris v. PruitteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API