Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burt v. New Jersey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 15, 1973No. 72-6778Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Douglas, with whom Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall concur,

dissenting.

In Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609 (1965), we held that the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination prohibits a prosecutor from commenting to the jury upon the defendant’s failure to testify at his trial. Such a practice would place a price on the defendant’s invocation of his constitutional privilege— a price that would seriously undermine the value of that privilege. And in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), we held that the prosecutor may not introduce into evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States Ex Rel. Burt v. YeagerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API