Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McCollum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 12, 1934No. 2990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a suit by McCollum against appellant to set aside a compromise agreement settling a claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 8306 et seq.). The validity of the agreement was attacked upon the ground of fraud and the further ground that such agreement had not been approved by the Industrial Accident Board.

The appellee’s claim for compensation was presented to the board which, on May 31, 1932, made an award allowing compensation at the rate of $20 per week for an indeterminate period not exceeding 401 weeks.

The agreement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LongTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Williams Chastain v. LairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Funk v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Thrower v. BrownleeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Koral Industries, Inc. v. Security-Connecticut Life Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RR. Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Jones v. Texas Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Porter v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Woolsey v. Panhandle Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API