Legal Opinion
Woolsey v. Panhandle Refining Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 25, 1936No. 13410PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.
W. N. .Woolsey has appealed from a judgment of the district court sustaining a general demurrer to his petition and dismissing his suit after he declined to amend.
The following is quoted from appellant’s brief as a statement of the cause of action alleged in his petition, to which the general demurrer was sustained:
“The plaintiff alleged in his original petition upon which he went to trial that he was employed by the defendant on September 1, 1926, when he suffered a, severe injury to his spine, which entitled him to compensation; that the defendant carried compensation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Oilmen's Reciprocal Assn. v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Employers' Indemnity Corp. v. WoodsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Woolsey v. Panhandle Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938