State v. Edwards
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
The trial court overruled a demurrer to an indictment and as authorized by G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 10756, certified to this court the question to be important and doubtful.
The indictment is based upon our larceny statute. It arises out of the sale of corporate stock in a solvent Minnesota corporation. The sole accusation is that defendant knowingly made the false representation that the stock was not assessable after the purchase *447price was paid. Under our constitution each, stockholder in any corporation, except those organized for the purpose of carrying on any kind of manufacturing or…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Mutual Life Insurance v. PhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Windram v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Rosenberg v. CyrowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929