Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1929No. 27,651PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

The trial court overruled a demurrer to an indictment and as authorized by G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 10756, certified to this court the question to be important and doubtful.

The indictment is based upon our larceny statute. It arises out of the sale of corporate stock in a solvent Minnesota corporation. The sole accusation is that defendant knowingly made the false representation that the stock was not assessable after the purchase *447price was paid. Under our constitution each, stockholder in any corporation, except those organized for the purpose of carrying on any kind of manufacturing or…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. PhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Windram v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Rosenberg v. CyrowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API