Legal Opinion
Lal v. Borough of Kennett Square
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 25, 1996No. Civil Action 95-7938PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
In this action the plaintiff claims civil rights, RICO, and state law violations by a borough, a county, their officials, a state legislator, a common pleas court judge, and a court-appointed property receiver. The case arises out of Plaintiff Amrit Lai’s failure to comply with numerous municipal housing code provisions during his ownership and operation of two apartment buddings in Ken-nett Square, Pennsylvania.
Lai’s failure to comply resulted in several criminal and civil sanctions. Between 1988 and 1995, he was investigated, charged, prosecuted,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carl Nelson v. George Jashurek, PatrolmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hart v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Lal v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Lal v. Borough of Kennett SquareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Shepherdson v. NigroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.