Legal Opinion

Parkhill v. Nusor (In Re Nusor)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1991No. BAP No. CC-89-1961-VJO, Bankruptcy No. LAX 88-52662-SB, Adv. No. LAX 88-01768-SBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOLINN, Bankruptcy Judge:

Appellant Robin A. Parkhill (“Parkhill”) appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment finding that a note signed by debtor-appellee Irene Vazquez Nusor (“Nu-sor”) was not a negotiable instrument and avoiding Parkhill’s lien on real property. Parkhill argues that the note was a negotiable instrument under the California Uniform Commercial Code (“Commercial Code”), that she is a holder in due course, and that she is insulated from Nusor’s defenses against the note’s enforceability.

We affirm the judgment below in most respects but on different grounds, and we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hansen v. Finn (In Re Curry & Sorensen, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Pioneer Technology, Inc. v. Eastwood (In Re Pioneer Technology, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Kaw Valley State Bank & Trust Co. v. RiddleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Stewart v. ThorntonArizona Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gardenhire v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Gardenhire)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Schmidt v. Goscicki (In Re Goscicki)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API